← AI Prompt ToolkitLitigation
Deposition Analysis & Case Strategy
Comprehensive deposition workup: admissions, adverse statements, damages evidence, and discovery follow-ups.
When to use it
Use as the first-pass review of any new deposition — gives you a structured summary of who said what, what helps, what hurts, and what you need to chase next. Pairs with Contradiction Analyzer and Cross-Examination Prep for full workup.
The prompt
Copy the prompt below, paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or your firm's preferred LLM, then paste your transcript where the placeholder indicates.
How to use it well
- Run this BEFORE the more specialized prompts (Contradiction, Cross-Examination, Strategy) — it gives you the lay of the land they build on.
- The "Document Requests" section often surfaces production gaps you can chase via follow-up subpoenas or interrogatories.
- Note the explicit caveat in the original prompt: AI transcripts are for internal case prep, not certified court filings. Order certified transcripts for the depositions you actually use at trial.
- For depositions over 4 hours, consider chunking the transcript and running this prompt on each chunk separately to avoid token limits.
Expected output
A structured deposition workup with favorable/adverse statement separation, timeline highlights, damages evidence, discovery follow-ups, and credibility assessment — all with transcript citations.
Related prompts
Contradiction Analyzer
Surface contradictions and inconsistencies within or across deposition transcripts.
Cross-Examination Prep
Generate cross-examination outlines from a deposition transcript with question sequences and impeachment evidence.
Legal Strategy Developer
Synthesize a deposition into case-theory implications, settlement leverage, and trial strategy.
Frequently asked questions
What if the deposition is over 4 hours long?
For very long depositions (4+ hours of audio = roughly 35K-50K words of transcript), chunk the transcript into 2-3 sections and run the prompt on each separately. Most current LLMs handle long contexts but quality of analysis can degrade past 30K-40K input tokens. Concatenate the per-chunk outputs at the end.
Does it separate favorable from adverse statements?
Yes. Two distinct sections: Favorable Admissions (statements supporting your position, with direct quotes and references) and Adverse Statements (testimony challenging your position, with credibility flags). Run the prompt twice from each side's perspective if you want both views.
Can the output support motion practice directly?
Yes. The structured fact catalog (with citations) is suitable for direct quote integration into motion briefs, particularly summary judgment motions and motions in limine. Always verify cited quotes against the source transcript before filing.