← AI Prompt ToolkitClient work
Client Intake Summary
Convert a recorded intake meeting into a structured intake summary for the case file.
When to use it
Use after recording a client consultation when you need a comprehensive intake document for case evaluation, conflict-checking, and retainer decisions — capturing factual background, claims, damages, and client expectations in one structured pass.
The prompt
Copy the prompt below, paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or your firm's preferred LLM, then paste your transcript where the placeholder indicates.
How to use it well
- Verify the captured "Statute of limitations considerations" against your jurisdiction's actual deadlines — AI may flag the right concept but miss the specific deadline that applies.
- Use the output as the working draft of your intake memo, not the final — paralegal or attorney review should add legal analysis, conflict-check results, and engagement-letter scope.
- For high-volume practices, this prompt makes intake meeting documentation 10x faster — record, transcribe, run prompt, edit.
- For privileged communications, treat the transcript and the prompt output the same as any other privileged material in your matter management system.
Expected output
A complete intake summary covering client info, factual background, evidence list, damages analysis, potential claims, statute-of-limitations flags, and next-step action items.
Related prompts
Key Facts Extractor
Pull facts, evidence references, and legal elements from a deposition into a structured catalog.
Meeting Minutes Generator
Generate formal meeting minutes from a recorded meeting transcript in business-documentation style.
Action Item Tracker
Pull every commitment, deliverable, and follow-up from a meeting transcript into a tracked action registry.
Frequently asked questions
Will it flag statute-of-limitations issues from the intake?
It flags timing-related concerns based on what the client said ("the incident happened two years ago"), but it cannot calculate the actual deadline for your jurisdiction and cause of action. Treat the AI flag as a prompt to do the SOL analysis manually, not a substitute for it.
Can it identify potential conflicts of interest?
It catalogs all parties and witnesses mentioned, which is exactly the input your conflict-checking system needs. Run that party list through your firm's conflict-check process — the prompt does not perform conflict checks itself.
How should I handle privileged content from intake?
Treat the prompt output as privileged work product and store with the matter file under the same controls as any other privileged document. If your firm has restrictions on which AI tools can process privileged content, route through whichever LLM your AI policy permits — most enterprise ChatGPT/Claude tiers offer no-training contractual terms.